The model on this page is fake.
Olivia Casta
aka Olivia Clรกudia Motta Casta 
- Age: 28 years young
- Born: Thursday 15th of August 1996
- Ethnicity: Caucasian
- Profession: Virtual Influencer
- Hair color: Brown
- Eye color: Green
- Height: 5'8" (or 172 cm)
- Weight: 130 lbs (or 59 kg)
- Body type: Slim
- Measurements: 36-25-34
- Bra/cup size: 34D show conversions
- Boobs: Real/Natural
- Instagram follower count: 3.0m (as of May 2025)
Olivia Casta Performances
Solo: Nudity (Topless Only)
Olivia Casta On Babepedia's Blog
Olivia Casta Links
Site Logo | Link | Publication Date | Report Link |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Olivia Casta naked leaks - AIHooking.com | 2025-03-25 | ⚠ |
![]() | Olivia Casta - Your Celebrities Archive (yca3.com) | 2024-12-17 | ⚠ |
![]() | Maria Tretjakova - Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs | 2024-10-15 | ⚠ |
![]() | Olivia Casta Nude Porn Pics | xPicsly | 2023-09-19 | ⚠ |
![]() | Olivia Casta - nude erotic pics โญ 2 sets | 2023-02-25 | ⚠ |
![]() | Olivia Casta hot blonde big tits and round ass fake model hd wallpapers gallery ... | 2023-02-12 | ⚠ |
![]() | Maria Tretjakova - Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs | 2022-10-25 | ⚠ |
![]() | Olivia Casta Pictures in an Infinite Scroll - 57 Pictures | 2022-04-15 | ⚠ |
Leave a comment
Commenting is disabled for non-registered users. Please register and login if you want to leave comments.
User comments
Fake or not, did your meat get hard?
If not, you have a problem.
And, your problem is not mine.
2025-06-28 01:45 🛈 ⚠
And I wonder when this debate will finally end, because it has been going on for 3 years now ๐
2025-06-21 11:40 🛈 ⚠
It's insane that there are still guys(see below) who refuse to believe it's the other model with AI filters even though this site showed definitive proof and she has been exposed on other forums. Once a guy gets horny, his brain shuts off lol. AI taking over and guys are falling in love with girls who don't even exist and defending their honor on sites like this lmao.
We are seeing guys who will freak out about fake models and refuse to believe the reality that they don't exist. And they will refuse to listen to anyone. We are going to be seeing a lot of that in the coming years. Dudes are going to go nuts over AI women. They are even giving money to these AI women on Onlyfans and other sites lmao.
2025-06-18 11:27 (edited 2025-06-18 11:51) 🛈 ⚠
It all points to one guy with multiple accounts. joster-dilan, Reegnant, babehfyat, and even Romariostephan are all one and the same person.
Update: I've blocked these 4 accounts and removed the comments for making multiple accounts and being disrespectful.
2025-06-18 13:43 (edited 2025-06-19 12:49) 🛈 ⚠
@ Pryda (admin) ๐ช๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฝ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐, there is no definitive evidence confirming that โOlivia Castaโ and โMaria Tretjakovaโ are the same person as of June 18, 2025.
Itโs important to recognize that nearly every model featured on this platform has, at some point, used techniques like airbrushing, Photoshop, or AI-powered tools to enhance their appearance. These practices have been widespread in photography for decadesโ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐โ๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ.
Olivia Castaโs case is far from unique. The power to alter images has existed for generations, used by professionals through lighting tricks, retouching, and digital manipulation. ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐โtoday, virtually anyone can refine how they present themselves online with just a few taps.
From celebrities and influencers to everyday users, digital enhancements are commonly used to create more polished, idealized versions of oneself. This ongoing evolution raises valid questions around authenticity, perception, and how we define identity in the digital age.
Returning to the โOlivia Castaโ topic, the debate remains fueled by hearsay, conspiracy theories, and online speculationโ๐ป๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ. Meanwhile, over a hundred+ obviously AI-generated or digitally altered model profiles continue to circulate, on Babepedia unchallenged. ๐ง๐ผ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ ๐ต๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น.
Given all this, I believe itโs premature and potentially ๐บ๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ like โ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒโ at the top of the โOlivia Castaโ profile. As of now, there is no verifiable evidence proving that โOlivia Castaโ and โMaria Tretjakovaโ are the same individual, or that this persona was wholly AI-generated or digitally constructed.
Until such evidence is made publicly available, ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒโ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐โ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ ๐๐ผ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป. If the site feels compelled to address the ongoing speculation, ๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ถ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ. For example: โ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ด๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น'๐ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐, ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐บ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐.โ This approach respects the truth, reflects the current uncertainty, and avoids misleading visitors with unverified assumptions.
Transparency mattersโespecially in a digital landscape shaped by both perception and pixels.
2025-06-19 05:37 (edited 2025-06-19 05:37) 🛈 ⚠
That means this site can't be taken seriously, then. Isn't this so-called site Admin. Pryda should be mindful of these things to avoid deceiving its customers.
2025-06-19 09:57 🛈 ⚠
I agree that today, there is little evidence on Olivia's social media to back up our claims that her face is AI-generated and that her body is that of Maria Tretjkova. They/she have done a good job at cleaning up past mistakes and improving the technology to make it very believable.
I feared for a while that the day would come when we would have to re-defend claims that were clear as water when we made them, simply because AI tools are getting better, and Maria/Olivia and her team (?) are really good at cleaning up and improving their setup.
To defend the "fake" label, we have to go back to photos and footage from years ago, back when it was still clear to the average surfer that she was fake.
As mentioned before, we have a blog post where we show such proof. It's clearly linked on this page (click the "Rise of the fake model" link under her photos). It presents the proof that you are looking for. Furthermore, I invite you to try some image AI detection tools. Take any of the photos currently on her Instagram. Most tools will likely say it's close to 100% human. But try it with her old photos from 2021/2022 and before, and the results will shift to the other side. We have just added a new section to this blog post, focusing on AI image detection.
If you still disagree, I invite you to debunk our claims with convincing proof.
Also, ask yourself these questions:
- Why is she removing all of her old material?
- Why has Maria Tretjakova removed all of her social media?
- Why is there no clip of her talking? Why is she always alone in her photos and videos?
- Why is she almost always looking at the camera?
- Why was she never interviewed?
- Why was there a person here making 4 accounts just to sow doubt? They were not posting in any other profiles.
2025-06-19 13:43 🛈 ⚠
Iโve been following this whole debate for a while now and thought Iโd chime in, if thatโs alright. These same questions keep coming up, but most of them donโt really hold up when you look at them with a bit of perspective and common sense. So here we go:
Why did she remove old material?
Probably for the same reason lots of creators do, to refine her image and remove earlier content that no longer fits the current aesthetic or standard. Itโs normal for people to want more control over how they present themselves online.
Why did Maria Tretjakova delete her social media?
If she retired from modelling in 2021, as has been suggested, then wiping her online presence seems like a fairly reasonable step. Loads of people do that after stepping out of public life. It doesnโt automatically mean anything sinister.
Why is there no clip of Olivia speaking?
Actually, there is. She ran a New Yearโs giveaway not long ago, and in her own posts mentioned that winners would receive a personalised video greeting. Itโs unlikely those people would share a private message publicly, and even if they did, itโs not guaranteed the video would stay online for long. But the idea that โshe never speaksโ just isnโt true.
Why is she always alone in her photos and videos?
Thatโs kind of the point, her content is focused, styled, and curated. Itโs a one-person aesthetic, and plenty of people on Instagram do the same. Itโs about mood and presentation, not some secret conspiracy.
Why is she always looking directly at the camera?
Because thatโs what portrait photography usually involves. Models tend to know their best angles, and if looking at the lens works for her, why wouldnโt she stick with it?
Why was she never interviewed?
Maybe she doesnโt want to be. Not everyone is chasing interviews or press exposure. Being private isnโt the same thing as being fake.
Why did someone create four accounts to argue about this?
One might just as easily ask why so much effort is being made to prove a theory that, by the authorโs own admission, relies on dated material and AI detection tools of questionable accuracy. The internet attracts all sorts: fans, critics, and people with far too much time on their hands(I also just created an account today to join the discussion)
Bottom line: most of these questions have pretty ordinary answers. None of them prove anything, and in most cases, the explanation is justโฆ sheโs a model managing her brand in 2025 like everyone else.
I donโt mean to offend anyone, I think everyone will stick to their opinion anyway.
2025-06-19 17:08 🛈 ⚠
You give plausible explanations that make sense if you want to believe (in) her. But why are you only focusing on these side questions instead of focusing on the main proof from the blog post? Specifically, the old photo comparisons with the birthmarks, the TikTok screenshot, the old AI-generated images, and the new ones that are labeled as generated by Stable Diffusion, which is great for generating high-quality and consistent faces.
"by the authorโs own admission, relies on dated material"
The whole point is that the dated material contains the fingerprints of being AI-generated. The new stuff is too well-made.
"AI detection tools of questionable accuracy"
We never wrote that the accuracy is questionable. We used multiple tools, and most of the results aligned, with high confidence.
"I think everyone will stick to their opinion anyway"
You're right. It feels like a losing battle. In 2022/2023, nobody was doubting her fakeness. But the better she becomes, the more people will believe she's real.
2025-06-20 01:04 (edited 2025-06-20 11:11) 🛈 ⚠
Sorry, but I can't see much value in your points since they are based on her being real and then working back from there. I have never heard her speak ONCE. If you check YouTube or search on Google, there is no video of her speaking. Her videos all have that distinct AI feel. While AI is getting better and better, you can still tell.
This site literally showed that Maria took some of her old Instagram pics and used a filter to create Olivia. The same exact pics! You can't explain that away or come up with a defense. That was in 2021/22. She has much better tech now.
https://www.babepedia.com/blog/rise-of-the-fake-model/#more-2089
But we are fighting a losing battle. Guys WANT to believe and there are more and more AI models now that they are falling in love with. In the end, a guy's sex drive always win out and they are now choosing to see AI as real.
2025-06-20 01:47 (edited 2025-06-20 01:48) 🛈 ⚠
@Pryda
The thing is, this isn't the normal, AI enhanced model.. it's literally somebody else. You'll notice that through all of these arguments against her being labeled as fake, they skate over that fact. I don't know how long your logs go back in terms of comments, but I do believe that about a half a year ago there were several people who found proof that it's a scam, and I think that's when you changed it. To put it nicely, many of these people are embarrassed that they've been donating to a scam, so they're going to defend it regardless of if they know that they're actually correct or not.
2025-06-20 00:39 🛈 ⚠