☰

Babepedia Features

Babepedia Gallery Ratings by Users

by

I’d like to open a forum about the rating criteria that you, the users, adhere to when rating Babepedia galleries.

Do you have a set criterion in regard to how many stars you give a gallery?

Which criteria is the most important for you? (real boobs, fake boobs, ethnicity, height, body type etc.).

What causes you to give one gallery a 5, and another a 1?

Your feedback will help sculpt future gallery listings more specifically if we can gain a better understanding of the thought process behind the ratings.

Let ‘er rip in the comments section, guys!  No holds barred.  That leaves it wide open for you guys, Raelian, Phobos and everyone else with a passion for the female glam form! 😉

Test Babepedia’s Favorite Picker

by

Around two years ago, a user named ForgetAboutIt suggested a personalized ranking system on our ideas page. It includes an example with Pokémon that shows you a large selection of Pokémon, and the user repeatedly chooses one or more favorites from a small selection. After a while, the system knows which is preferred and shows it as a favorite. The user can repeat these steps until a top 10 or top 20 of favorites is selected. The user can drag & drop favorites to make a final order. We like the idea but it didn’t receive many votes. Recently, another user, mrsecretoo, posted an enthusiastic comment, which brought it to our attention again. So we’ve decided to give the idea a chance.

We want to present our Favorite Picker to you. It’s a first test version, so please expect bugs. It currently uses the top 200 as starting point. When you’re done and have your favorites, nothing is done with these, and the selection is discarded when you close the browser. 

Please let us know what you think about this in the comments. If many people like it, we will give it a visible place on the site. “Favorite Picker” is the name of the original script. If you have a good name, please put your suggestion in the comments. If you’d like to see specific features, please don’t hesitate to let us know, too.

We have some ideas in mind:

  • Allowing the user to choose the starting set, like the current top 100, top 250, top 1000, specific lists, personal lists, personal ratings (e.g., all 10’s), or even the results from the advanced search tool.
  • Allowing the user to save the list of favorites to a new personal list, which also stores the order. 
  • Allowing the user to choose the “batch size”, the number of babes on the page. It’s currently set to 20. 
  • Allowing the user to stop, save the picking process, and resume later.
  • Using the results to influence the top 100 rankings.

 

UPDATE 07/08/2024: After reading your feedback, we realize that this idea does not seem enjoyable to most people. It’s too time-consuming, dull, or complicated. The proposed ideas require a serious time investment and it doesn’t seem worth it. So, we have decided that we will put it in the freezer. 

Babepedia Ranking Algorithm Discussion

by

Let’s dive into the details of our ranking system, because we want to hear your opinion on how we can our babes.

Our current ranking system is pretty simple: once a babe has 25 valid votes, she can rank in our top lists. The result is that a newcomer may shoot up to a top spot in our top 100. Many of them, especially new number ones, get voted down very quickly. If a handful of people decide she’s not worthy by voting under 5/10, she will probably never reach the top 25 again.

Since we started tracking the #1 babe in a separate list in August 2020, we have seen 252 models reach the #1 spot. Around 200 of them only stayed in the #1 spot for a single day. 

If you aim to have a top list where newcomers regularly get a shot at a high listing, but a small minority can shoot them down, then this is a good system. If you aim for more stability where only proven, famous babes with many votes can list high, the system can be improved.

Read more