Nata Lee

After reading a comment where someone was complaining about Ren going back to 1, I had a look at the archives, Nata Lee has rarely been out of the Top 100, that's impressive longevity.....the chick who was 1 today in 2022 is now 32 thousand and something.

Posted by Marvin_SimpReply2 12024-12-05 11:31  ⚠

Her delicious big natural boobs are really turning me on 😍🥰🥰

Posted by booblover89Reply2 102024-11-16 22:55  ⚠

"natural" :D

Posted by Skyliner89Reply12 02024-11-17 02:26  ⚠

wow she's like a chameleon, like that tubes song, she's one in a million girls.. Like a million in one..

Posted by Amiganaut2Reply1 12024-11-02 10:09 (edited 2024-11-02 10:10)  ⚠

I've been arguing for some time that the Mavrin Models that dominate the top ten are photoshopped to such an extent that they should not be allowed here under the rules of the site. Mavrin Models include Cristy Ren, Nata Lee, Marina Nabokina, Alina Lando, among others. People get angry when I point this out. I want to show you something to demonstrate my point.

The most objective way to detect photoshop is using a process called Error Level Analysis. ELA is used in forensics and other official capacities to detect photo alteration. ELA detects lossy compression artifacts in an image. In an image that has not been doctored/photoshopped, there would be uniform compression across the entire image. If an image has been digitally altered, ELA will highlight the parts of the photo that have different compression levels. That sounds complicated. In essence it means that a normal image put through ELA will return the same picture in grayscale (black and white), while an altered image will be covered with various blobs and other patterns showing the places where it was altered.

This link shows Error Level Analysis on a photo of Nata Lee. The picture on the left is the Mavrin published one, while the right shows the results of the ELA test. https://ibb.co/m6LGz2Q

As you can see, the photo has been so heavily altered that almost every part of her body is covered in dark blobs. The larger circles indicate greater degrees of alteration. For reference, you can see that the unaltered parts of the photo just look the same but in black and white - look at the chairs and table.

Babepedia users have the least ability to recognize photoshop and AI that I've seen anywhere online, except maybe Facebook. Olivia Casta and Riley Guava are both some of the longest standing number ones in site history and neither of them even exist. The stakes on Babepedia are low, frankly - the top 100 is just for fun. In other cases, not being able to detect photo alteration is actually very dangerous, setting you up to get scammed. I hope that this is helpful to people and at least encourages them to be more skeptical of what they see in photos online. Once you know what you're looking for with photoshop, you can spot it from a mile away.

Posted by ryanonReply31 02024-10-22 12:51  ⚠

Interesting stuff. You've explained it well. Would you be interested in writing a guest post about this for our blog, which we'll then link to from the relevant profiles pages? It can go deeper into the subject, with more of these ELA versions.

Posted by Pryda (admin)Reply12 02024-10-22 16:32  ⚠

I would be willing to do that. But I want to be careful with how I present this. I don't want it to be something that comes across as me just trashing specific models or even a specific agency. I don't really have anything against these people and it's really not harming anything if users here enjoy them. I just want people to have some skills recognizing photoshop so that actual criminals will have a harder time deceiving people.

Posted by ryanonReply7 02024-10-23 09:10 (edited 2024-10-23 09:16)  ⚠

@ryanon: We're happy to publish your guest post if you find the time to write one. You can send it to us via email (see contact form).

Posted by Pryda (admin)Reply1 02024-10-27 01:43  ⚠

It might be a good idea to limit how many models from the same companany appear on the top 25 if possible but then again as its done by votes from users it would be hard

Posted by firetop22Reply0 02024-11-01 03:50 (edited 2024-11-01 03:51)  ⚠

@ryanon - were you still planning on authoring that photoshop blog post? I'm looking forward to it!

Posted by luckyasianmanReply0 02024-12-12 17:40  ⚠

@RYANON - This is a quality post if I ever saw one. Thanks for educating us. If you do author that guest post, I'd love to see a couple examples of the incremental stages of going from RAW to incredibly altered and how those blobs change as the adjustments become greater.

Posted by luckyasianmanReply0 02024-10-26 20:32  ⚠

jeeeeesus christ you need to get out more

Posted by mikeroyneReply2 32024-11-01 03:11  ⚠

Intresting

Posted by firetop22Reply0 02024-11-01 03:49  ⚠

I agree totally. I have a video of Nata Lee (Aka Natalya Krasavina)still with normal (small) tits and as a brunette, doing camera porn. This was before her alterations etc. Cute girl, but does not look normal at all. Same goes for all the Mavrin models and many others too. Too much photoshopping.

Posted by bmfhdReply0 02024-11-05 21:15  ⚠

@bmfhd - mind sharing the video with me, please?

Posted by luckyasianmanReply0 02024-11-06 06:29  ⚠

Here: https://thothub.org/videos/552229/natalee-007-webcam2/

Posted by bmfhdReply1 02024-11-13 22:15  ⚠