Most popular pages: Top 100 - Best OnlyFans - Birthdays
Mariia Derevianko image 1 of 2
Official websiteInstagram account
Mariia Derevianko image 2 of 2

Mariia Derevianko

aka Марія Дерев'янко More info on her aliases

Mariia Derevianko alias list:
Марія Дерев'янко - Real name (Ukrainian Cyrillic)
User Rating: 8.91/10 (78 votes)
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
Your Rating: X/10
You need to be registered
and email-confirmed if you want to vote.
Rollover to rate this babe
Current rank: #2194 Ranking Graph
38 have favorited her

About Mariia Derevianko

Mariia Derevianko, known in Ukrainian as Марія Дерев’янко, is a Ukrainian model born on August 25, 1996, in Kyiv, Ukraine. Details about her early life and family background are limited, as she has not shared extensive personal information publicly. Growing up in Kyiv, she likely experienced a typical urban upbringing in Ukraine before entering the modeling industry. Her ethnicity is Ukrainian, consistent with her nationality and place of birth.

She is primarily recognized by her given name, Mariia Derevianko, with no widely documented aliases or alternative names in her professional career. Her modeling career began to take shape around 2018, when she started working with agencies such as Blow Models and WhyNot Models. Standing at 5 feet 10 inches (178 cm), she has been featured in fashion campaigns and editorials, with measurements often listed as 85-60-90 cm (bust-waist-hips). Her work has included runway appearances and photoshoots, establishing her as a notable figure in European fashion modeling.

On Instagram, she maintains a modest following under the handle "@mashaderevianko," where she shares modeling photos and personal updates, though her account is not among the most prominent in the influencer sphere.

Physically, Mariia is described as having a tall, slender frame, with dark brown hair and brown eyes. Her bust size is reported as approximately 85 cm (around 33-34 inches, typically a B cup), fitting her model proportions. There is no public evidence or statement from her indicating cosmetic surgeries on her breasts, lips, buttocks, nose, or other areas. Similarly, no tattoos or piercings are prominently documented in her modeling work or social media.

Men who comment on her online presence often highlight her elegant height and slim, toned physique as appealing traits. Her sexy appeal is frequently tied to her poised runway presence and striking facial features, with her long legs and sharp cheekbones commonly praised. Her unique quality lies in her classic Eastern European beauty combined with a professional demeanor, distinguishing her in the competitive modeling world.

Income specifics are unavailable, but as a working fashion model with agency representation, her earnings likely align with industry standards for mid-tier models, potentially in the tens of thousands annually from bookings and campaigns. No significant controversies are tied to her name as of April 2025, maintaining a low-profile personal life beyond her professional work.

Currently, Mariia continues to pursue her modeling career, likely based in Europe, with recent activity suggesting she remains active in fashion shoots and agency collaborations. Her focus appears to remain on traditional modeling rather than branching into other media or content creation spheres.

Mariia Derevianko Photos (Uploaded By Our Users)

Mariia Derevianko Links

No links posted yet.

Leave a comment

Commenting is disabled for non-registered users. Please register and login if you want to leave comments.

User comments

Same dude who gave Desire Inglander a 1 star rating also gave this one a 1 star rating. This is obvious manipulation.

Posted by pempas 2025-04-05 03:07  🛈  

Reply to

How can you know it's the same user? It maybe happened at the same time, but I doubt you can know it's the same user.

My guess is the admins of Babepedia just "move" some girls down when these girls get a score which is "too high". So, you might be right, the same "admin user", but it's just a guess.


Posted by Acido 2025-04-05 16:57  🛈  

Reply to

I think I can see more information because of my contributions. I can see a list of all votes, username and timestamp on each page.

No, the admins don't change the rankings. But the problem is that they are already very busy with other stuff, so they don't have time to check for manipulation on every page. They need a manipulation detection algorithm. My guess is that the ranking list will look very, very different when removing all manipulation votes.

Also, it is again the same users who gave the current newcomers in the top 25 list 1 star ratings today.


Posted by pempas 2025-04-06 17:28 (edited 2025-04-06 17:29)  🛈  

Reply to

The algorithm actually has a feature to avoid that few dozen of 10 fired by half a dozen of Minkiettas could push too high profiles not deserving it.
It's something that goes with the logaritm of the total number of votes.
There is no manipulation.
Only a lack of basic math knowledge.


Posted by Omri_Sboddere 2025-04-06 17:47 (edited 2025-04-06 17:49)  🛈  

Reply to

There is certainly manipulation by users going on and there is nothing running in the background to guarantee it from not happening. It's easy to verify, just go ahead and give a random profile a 1 star rating and then see how the rating changes. It's exactly (n_votes*rating_current + 1)/(n_votes + 1).

Posted by pempas 2025-04-06 20:17  🛈  

Reply to

Obviously a new vote is taken into account and the result promptly recalculated.
But I was talking about another issue.
In this moment Lucy Pinder is 9.08 with 1391 votes.
But she stands above Claire Andrisani who is 9.15.
Why ?
Because the second babe has 88 votes only.
From a larger amount of data it can be inferred a math model like:

Real_rating = Current_rating + alpha*log(N_votes)

where alpha could be something around 0.1
(difficult to say better because we know only two digits after the dot)
( and we don't know if the result has been roughly trimmed or properly rounded up/down)


Posted by Omri_Sboddere 2025-04-06 20:44 (edited 2025-04-06 20:50)  🛈  

Reply to

I see what you mean. That feature was introduced not so long ago and it was commented on somewhere. In my opinion it comes with more drawbacks than advantages and it doesn't help in cases where a small group of users try to systematically downvote anything new that makes it into top 25. There are much better solutions using robust statistical methods, like even just weighting any votes by the inverse of their distance from the median vote, normalized by the standard deviation, i.e. x*std(x)/(x-u(x)), x being the random variable for the votes and u(x) and std(x) being median/mean and standard deviation or any other preferred first order moment and second order moment.

Posted by pempas 2025-04-06 21:55  🛈  

Reply to

Very good in a mathematical perspective.
Maybe not always in the skills of a even talented "raw" programmer.
This makes me remember a thing of 20 yr ago.
A guy who had to set PLC of an industrial device in the factory where I used to work, lost half a day for a malfunction.
He continued to forget the 3.14 in the code lines related to a rotating part.


Posted by Omri_Sboddere 2025-04-06 23:13  🛈  

Reply to

He probably felt the urge to punch himself afterwards

Posted by pempas 2025-04-06 23:22  🛈