Last year, we held a poll to ask you, our users, what feature they would like to see most. We picked a few and implemented two items from the top 3 (Improved bra/cup size handling and Personal top 10 rankings).
This year, we want to do it again. We have compiled a new list based on our ideas and the best ideas from the ideas page. Please pick one and submit your vote. Also, please drop your opinion in the comments section. If you want to vote for more than one idea, simply post it in the comment section, and we’ll take it into consideration.
Last year, the Photo Ratings idea was a favorite of many. We implemented it but were unhappy with how it works, so we put it “on hold” for now and have included a variation in the poll below.
The options are:
- Photo Ratings (Revised) – This revision of last year’s idea. We want to allow the users to rate the profile page photos on the site with a thumbs up/down. We don’t want to clutter the current photo viewer with a voting system, so we would add a separate “Photo rating” page where you can view and rate all the photos. Only registered users can vote here. In the second phase, trusted members with a history of contributions can change or remove photos with a certain threshold.
- Profile Attributes/Tags – Users can attach attributes or tags to profile pages. It is very broad and used for things currently not on the page. We can use it for hobbies (dog lover, car enthusiast, …), skills (polyglot, martial arts, …), general physical attributes (curly hair, pale skin, birthmark, …), breasts (size, shape, firmness, areolas, nipples, …), and more. We can then integrate that it into the advanced search engine and OnlyFans search and make a lot more lists.
- Social Network Features – Bring some social network features to the site, such as avatars (user photos), adding friends, private messaging, …
- Improving The Site Design – Improving the site with changes here and there, mainly focusing on the advanced search and profile pages.
- New Site Design – Similar to the previous item but going further. Think of it like a complete makeover.
- Chatbox – Some discussions on the site tend to go off-topic. We can add a dedicated chatbox where users can go off-topic. We can go even further and make it like a message board/forum.
Update (March 24): We’re closing the poll today. We have a clear winner and two that are pretty close. We’ll work on these in the coming months. Thanks to everyone who voted and contributed in the comments.
All would seem alright, but most of all, I’d like to have a profile photo. So I can better reflect myself.
My one suggestion would be to have the ability to screen some individual users comments. I’m happy with the rest of the current configuration.
Last year you implemented a feature to screen comments that may be repetitive, irrelevant or disrespectful. In the new suggestions you have listed it appears you may allow comments and those may follow the same type of input. Please give an option to filter some types comments or users.
I second this for sure.
There are very few users that are consistently worth banning. Nothing that couldn’t be pushed over into a chatbox off the Babe page or at least muted in the Comments section.
But one in particular who would have been booted from any other moderated forum months ago definitely needs an off switch.
i think the site is functioning just fine as it is. there is no actual need for change, especially the social aspect. the commenting system is good enough
Good enough but needs some rough edges sanded down.
A mute switch would be great to just turn off the chat so you don’t need to see it if you dont want to.
Or maybe a mute on individual users so they can be abandoned to rage by themselves in the dark.
That would be acceptable.
The user photo input option could use some refining. For me. that process is overly complicated
Are you referring to the photo upload page where you drag & drop the photo onto the page?
What exactly is complicated about this? How can it become easier?
Yes, the drag and drop of photos to a models profile page is what I’m referring to. I haven’t used it for sometime so I can’t detail the issues I had, I do remember it seemed difficult at that time so I stopped trying. I can try again.
Ok. You can drag & drop photos to it, but you can also click on it to select and upload the files.
Please give it another try and let us know how you think we can improve it. We felt confident that the upload page was very user friendly, but I suppose there’s always room for improvement.
For me everything is good, the only thing is sometimes I search babes and you not have them listed and I have to suggest it and sometimes is refused. my sugestion is for you to expand your engine search to other websites, thanks.
If an entry is refused, you should receive an email with an explanation.
“my sugestion is for you to expand your engine search to other websites, thanks.”
What do you mean by this? Do you want to search other sites through our site? I don’t understand why that would be useful.
Glad he brought this up.
I think the “Suggest a Babe” thing needs to be a little more than just her name and should include at least 1 non-nude main profile pic.
If she doesn’t have a profile pic at minimum, her profile shouldn’t show up in the “More Like” section either.
I can’t see how you would look for a chick, not find her, then suggest her THEN mark down who she looks like, but NOT submit an actual pic of her.
We will consider this mandatory photo upload with a new profile suggestion.
What do we do if the photo isn’t suitable? Rejecting the whole thing seems like a good approach, forcing the user to make an effort.
For me? I agree.
If they can’t go to the trouble to give ONE pic of their suggestion, then don’t post it until they resubmit it with one.
Sounds like an easy fix.
There’s a ton of empty profiles on the site taking up space that someone was in a hurry to get posted, yet couldn’t be bothered to post a pic with their submission.
I don’t even click to look at them anymore since so many are empty and am considering just giving them a thumbs down.
Seeing NO pic doesn’t make me want to jump off-site and go find whoever they MIGHT be talking about.
If they want the world to see her, they need to share her. Easy peasy.
I don’t see the need to require a photo upload with a new profile suggestion, but I do agree that there’s no point in showing a profile without a photo in the “More Like” section. The text of a profile does not take up much storage space especially compared to a photo. I for one like to upload only the best photos I can find, which takes a good deal of effort sometimes especially for more niche babes
Not sure where to put this, but I wish I had the ability to search within a list. For example if I click on “top weather girl” I from there would like to filter to blondes under 5’5” with green eyes.
You can do this search (blonde weather girls with green eyes under 5’5″) on the advanced search page: https://www.babepedia.com/advancedsearch
But we can make this more apparent in the interface.
I’m still going nuts over the fact that there is no way to list the profiles of all the babes THAT I HAVE RATED 10. The advanced search currently lists profiles of all the babes that have a User Rating anywhere on a given range. What I want is the ability to see the profiles that I have rated 10, so the criteria is not a range but a sharp integral value assigned by me. I don’t care if the consensus of the Babepedia users have rated a babe 8.45 out of 10, if I have rated her 10, I want an easy peazy, lemon squeezy way to list the babes that are a 10 in my opinion. PLEASE, I humbly request you to make this happen. Fingers crossed.
There are two ways to do that currently.
1- sort your favorites by your rating, which puts your 10s at the top automatically
Or
2- make your own personal list, title it “My 10s” and add your 10s to it.
The second method is exactly the kind of situation I want to void, **maintaining a list manually**, I sometimes review my rating for a model and end up changing their rating which means I will have to then remember adding them to OR removing them from this manually maintained list of “My 10s”, which is really a bit of a rabbit hole. If an option to make a “smart” list based on the live/current value of a field (“Your Rating” in this case) used as a criteria to dynamically add or remove a profile to the said list would be one way to get it done, but it’s a bit too complex I’d assume.
The first method assumes I use the favorites feature, but I don’t. And again the whole point is I don’t want to maintain a list or put models into and out of buckets.
I suggested this as an idea yesterday in the “Ideas” page. Vote it if you think it would solve your problem
Actually there’s a third method: go to your profile page and you can see your votes, which lists them from 10->1. No need to add them to favorites.
But ya, being able to filter by personal vote in advanced search would help narrow down searches (“latinas I rated 9+, etc).
If you vote on over 100 women, then you can’t see them all
how can i upload photos do the babepedia website using the internet explorer, thanks
That’s literally right there on the bio page labeled “Upload a Photo”.
There has to be a better way to submit links to Galleries for Babes.
The current process is definitely harder than it needs to be.
Also-
Is there a good way to recommend pics in the future to replace old ones on a profile?
I do understand the desire to keep photo limits on each Babe profile.
(19 is literally a really odd number. Why not 25 or 30?)
But if you try to submit anything past the 19th, you are automatically stopped from submitting anything else.
Example: some of the ladies have vast amounts to draw from, but some Users have posted a Babe and 15 pics from her first ever sitting, leaving 4 spots for new pics, then it’s blocked forever.
Lastly- some of the models change their name almost as frequently as they change photographers or studios. This is especially true of models from Eastern Europe.
When those profiles merge, all the photos stay on the merged profile.
That’s great.
But a model that has not done 10 name changes in a year and possibly has literal decades of photograhic work in her history is limited to her first posted 19 pics.
You can use ‘Flag this profile’ to suggest the removal of photos that aren’t great. Once removed, you receive an email. This then opens the upload page again (assuming it was closed).
The number 19 is 4 + 15: There are max. 4 main profile photos and 15 user upload photos.
When we made the page many years ago, the most common desktop resolutions had room for 3 rows of 5 or 5 rows of 3 photos.
We may evaluate this again and maybe raise it to 20.
As for increasing it more: We’re walking on a thin line between making the site as good as possible (showing a good variety of photos) and keeping it manageable for our reviewer. If we increase it to 30 or higher, we’ll likely need to hire an extra person just to handle the reviews. He is already reviewing a few thousand photos per week. There is also the legal aspect. People tend to upload leaked photos from OnlyFans and paysites. This is a problem for some models and their agencies. The more we accept, the more private leaked photos are on there. This makes our position of “promoting the girls and their OnlyFans” less defensible. A sneak peak is ok, but a larger collection is not.
I use the “Flag” feature a lot, so I can vouch for it working for sure.
(That’s for my fellow Babepediacs.)
I just got about 5 email replies that recent recommended changes were made too.
This process works fine and I’m keeping someone busy. (Pryda?)
I absolutely agree with this. I think the photo replacement method should be more streamlined. For me, i like uploading pics for babes because i like doing it but then i see a profile with 12-13 pics from same gallery and same clothes, really makes me question these people.
We’re open to suggestions (to make it more streamlined).
But we also have to make it manageable for us. If we make it super easy and without limitations, many profiles are going to get new photo suggestions on a weekly basis. We’ll need to hire an extra person or two to get everything reviewed.
“a profile with 12-13 pics from same gallery and same clothes”
This shouldn’t happen. Our reviewer rejects photos if we already have 4 photos from the same gallery. Rare exceptions are made when the gallery is varied and there are no other photos available.
Please report these photos using “flag this profile”, so we can remove these and make room for other photos.
Image Ratings (Review) Add more options to control the pictures of the seductress because most users, when they see a picture of a seductress outside this site and they like it, search for it inside this site to be surprised by old and ugly pictures of the seductress that they saw and liked as her profile pictures or pictures that other users uploaded a long time ago, and when they want to change the pictures of that seductress to modern and beautiful pictures as the seductress appears at the present time, they face difficulty as the picture boxes are full and other pictures are not accepted, so I suggest adding an option to control the profile of a seductress by adding a profile separate from the main profile and controlling it by adding the seductress to a list specific to the user. Thank you.
As a new user who is still getting accustomed to how things work around here, I am confused how to add social media links. When I suggest a new profile, it asks for social media links which I do enter but they never show up once the profile is accepted. Then on a profile, there is a “Submit a link” option but this seems to be for galleries, etc. Am I missing something?
You add the social media links by clicking “Edit Biography”. Note that the links only show when there’s at least one photo.
The social media links question on the profile submission page is there to help the reviewer, as the models are not always easy to find.
Do I have to earn enough Karma/XP before the option shows for me? Because I do not see the Edit Biography option even on profiles with a profile photo
Nevermind, realized the Edit Biography option is on the left sidebar. Wasn’t expecting it to be there because other options are also located on the page itself.
Trademarks can be added to the profile page
Please clarify that. What kind of trademarks and how would it be useful?
Blocking individual users sure would be nice, but not an absolute requirement. I for one would like more list categories, perhaps for taller girls.
At minimum, give us the ability to have a profile photo. If the “social media features” fails. Please lol.
That nearly no one want an other site design is sad💩! I would like to have more international babes at your page: Asian, African, Australian etc.💃 have not another person interest in something else than US ladies🇺🇳?
Everyone wants every girl to have a pic, but some us want a compedium of hot girls but some of the girls in question want demand there photos taken down. You take all photoless girls off and some of our favorites get removed, just because they no longer want to bw models. Still remembered by us as a favorite. Just lwt us that remember them keep her on our lists and dont click if she doesnt have a pic and you dont remwmber her.
It is pretty complex to make a system where these models are not removed but moved to a separate storage that is still accessible for that small group of users with her in their list of favorites. It also presents a legal issue: when a model demands her photo to be taken down, it’s not always a friendly request. It often comes with a legal threat, forcing us to remove it completely. If we keep the stuff online but hidden from the public, that may result in serious legal issues.
I think it’s a nice request, but not worth it.
Categorized by country…. just like you can categorize by age.
Can you be more specific? We already have country lists and you can search by country using advanced search.
https://www.babepedia.com/top100countries
https://www.babepedia.com/advancedsearch
would it be too much to ask for the search bar text to also not be white as that is what the search box colour also is. there is zero constrast in colour. thank you. 😺
This sounds like a bug. Can you make a screenshot of what you’re seeing to info@babepedia.com?
… I think that the more details there are, the more precise the search is and this attracts more users… maybe it will be more “laborious” for those who update but that’s fine.