In 2017, we held a poll on this blog about whether or not to create a profile page for the first transgender Playboy Playmate, Ines Rau. Although the vote was overwhelming for “no,” we decided to create a profile for Ines a few years later because she is post-op, and we wanted a complete listing of all the Playboy Playmates. Times are changing, taboos are fading away, and there seems to be a growing demand to allow transexuals. It feels like the right time to evaluate our transgender/transexual policy.
Trans porn is now one of the most popular categories on Pornhub. There are ample trans porn sites on the web available.
According to the annual Pornhub Year in Review report, the platform’s “transgender” category experienced a massive boost in searches over the past 12 months, growing by over 75% to become the 7th most popular section in the world. The adult platform went on to note that the increase has led to trans porn becoming the most viewed category in Brazil.
Also interesting is the fact that women watch “trans male” porn 115% more while searching for “FTM”. Also, in addition, it grew by 202% on the PornhubGay side of things. As the popularity of trans porn continues to grow, it attracts a diverse audience, including shemales, gay individuals, and an increasing number of straight viewers. The genre’s allure lies in its ability to cater to various tastes and desires, offering a versatile range of scenarios. To truly delve into the world of transsexual porn, one must explore the best premium trans porn sites. These platforms feature captivating movies that kindle desire and promise an unforgettable viewing experience.
Time for another poll
So, what do you think? We’ve had a long-standing no-cock policy, but it may be time for a change. Should Babepedia change its rules and allow transgender people? And if we do, do we accept only post-op (no penis) or pre-op too?
And do we distinguish between TS/TG models that had their sex operation before or during/after their career? For example, retired Brazilian TS pornstar Danielle Foxxx had her operation years ago, but most of her videos show her with a penis. Let us know in the comments if you think this matters. We’re not including it as an option in the poll for now, to keep it simple.
The poll will close automatically after 1 week (on Feb 13).
We’re seeing some aggressive comments below. Comments that attack other users will not be accepted.
UPDATE 13/02/2024: The poll was closed today after receiving 1,114 votes. A majority of 70% voted for “no”, so we will not change our rules. Thanks to every who participated in the poll or the comments.
Even if Babepdia does end up allowing transgender, which I am totally against, then you should mark/label the page in some type of way, similar to pages where the models in question are assumed to be faked, so that anyone knows immediately the page is of a transgender.
Like male to female transgenders,other no comments guess it’s ok.male to female transexuals.
If you want to allow transwomen (pre- or post-op), that’s entirely up to you.
However, I would suggest that you
1) create separate top-level categories for biological women and transwomen;
2) clearly distinguish (by background and link colors) between them; and
3) give your website viewers the option to specify the content they want to see, as well as whatever content they don’t want to see. (This can probably be done with cookies.)
What about creating an entirely new site?
Exactly. Why taint the original purpose of this site for the sake of being progressive…
that would be the best solution this way you keep all the fanatics on both sides of the issue away from each other when little boys fight you separate them and that is basically what the fanatics on either side of this issue are acting like little boys instead of grown adult sitting at a table discussing both sides of an issue like human beings
In all honesty it’s a you-do-you situation. I think people get entirely to defensive on ideas they think aren’t “normal”. Similar to how people call Serena Williams or Teyana Taylor a man. Maybe create a new tag for all profiles (gonna be alot of profiles that need updating), but I’m in the faction that wouldn’t care either way. This is a unique website that is doing its on thing, the idea to be inclusive shouldn’t be so taboo.
Minus the fact, they are not being inclusive because they might not be including people who disagreed. The easier solution is to create another website for anyone who is transgender.
I was going to respond to your assessment of these two ladies and have decided against doing so.
Absolutely!
The numbers don’t lie. If it’s popular on pornhub.com it’s appropriate for Babepedia.
There should be a subcategory for it and it should list penis size.
Curiously although transgender is a major kink of mine I’m not interested in post-op trans, vaginas are for cis women.
Gay sex is also popular on pornhub. So, are we going to including men? That argument because it is popular on another site that Babepedia should do it also, makes nonsense.
Is it popular, really?
Trans pussies/cunts or post-op pussies/cunts or mtf trans pussies/cunts or post-op mtf trans pussies/cunts are or is valid!!!!!!
Just like trans penises/phalluses/cocks or post-op penises/phalluses/cocks or ftm trans penises/phalluses/cocks or post-op ftm trans penises/phalluses/cocks.
You can think of them as princesses and queens to admire, adore, appreciate, and revere but I think you are crazy.
All they did was the outer wrapping and nothing else.
Honestly, it should be allowed/permitted…way past time that pretty if not also petite passing post-op more-r passing mtf trans girls, at least/at minimum belong archived on babepedia and related organisation’s -related/-based websites.
Along with any and all/each and every/many or most of the(ir) works.
It’s taking way to long for everyone to see and hear the genuine love a lot of cis-gender hetero-sexual/bi-sexual men and ftm trans-gender/trans-sexual men who are or is hetero-sexual/bi-sexual feel towards me and my trans-gender/trans-sexual people, including pretty if not also petite passing post-op more-r passing mtf trans girls…who are or is my mtf trans sisters.
Being a mtf trans girl myself, I am biased and 1000000% in favour of allowing/permitting my professional porn people, other mtf trans girls to be archived.
But the problem is trans women are not women, but trans women hint the trans part. All trans women are doing is changing the wrapping (the outside appearance)
Whereas real women are women.
End the stigma of mtf trans girls and pretty if not also petite passing post-op more-r passing mtf trans girls…like end the stigma of gruff and tough big and strong tall and thin slim and slender meaty and muscly built and buff handsome hot hairy hung hulking hunk passing post-op more-r passing ftm trans guys who are or is my/our ftm trans brothers equivalents/counter-parts.
Then we should start posing cisgender guys on Babepedia too.
Thanks for the initiative !!!
I think that Babepedia, is a reference and should continue to be so. Treating all models, with the respect they deserve.
I will accept any decision you make. I will continue to be faithful to this community…
Greetings!!!
Hell no! Transgender are not women. Who cares just creat another website to list them. Babepedia must be pure women. Playboy through this way from transgender and others shits and was destroyed.
I’m in favor of going with the times. As for the survey, I guess you need to listen to the people that use the site, but also not sure that’s getting the most appropriate information. Already having two different “yes” options is giving more strength to the one “no” option, leaving “no” way in the lead. I don’t know anything else about the integrity of the survey, but I’m suspect when I click on the link a second time and it doesn’t recognize that I already voted. So, my opinion isn’t super strong. At minimum though, I say go for it to the extent you think best and just make sure the pages are labeled so people know what they’re in for.
I support the inclusion of trans women, but on a separate site called Transpedia. Those who are interested in both cis and trans women can bookmark and visit the two websites separately, while those with a narrower preference can browse one of the sites safe in the knowledge that (heaven forfend) a cock won’t appear when a pussy is expected / a pussy won’t appear when a cock is expected. This solution makes everyone happy.
Also, on the putative new site called Transpedia, the following classifications should be listed:
– Cock length (inches or centimeters)
– Cock circumference (inches or centimeters)
– Circumcised or intact
– Potency (ability to get hard)
– Pubic hair style
– Sexual role (top, bottom, or versatile)
Most guys who love the so-called “cocks in frocks”/so-called “chicks with dicks”/so-called “dudes with boobs”, my pre-op mtf trans sisters, also my current self too…would finance/fund/subsidise/welfarise, probably until we reach old age…
However, the same aforementioned pre-op mtf trans girls want to be or become post-op mtf trans girls and fully- develop to fully- integrate, accordingly and most do and go on to retire but “some”…like under 50% stay on, continually drops to quite a low amount who go on and develop fame along with fortune…such as Danielle Foxxx…
I’m sure the audience/viewership demographics changes or shifts too, from bi-sexual cis-gender men to bi-sexual/hetero-sexual cis-gender men.
Trans-babes/so-called “he-babes”/trans-broads/so-called “he-broads” are or is valid women, especially if verified with and post-op srs/grs/gcs, they are or is post-op.
Same logic/reasoning/rationality/logic for/with ftm trans guys/men.
oh Hell no!! this is BABE-pedia. not Guys-with tits-pedia. for the love of womanhood, please leave the sanctity of women alone!! create a new sight – Transpedia, then have a link on here. But do NOT show those people on here.
I vote yes, allow trans women! If the homophobes are afraid to see a penis, use only photo uploads that keep it hidden and members can use links or explore more on other sites such as PornHub, xhamster, tnaflix, ashemaletube, etc! Trans scenes are exciting and it is definitely arousing to see a woman and a trans woman together for me. The way the site handles the trans women now should just continue with perhaps a flag at the top of the page. Most of the photos available for upload identify the model as trans anyway (Grooby Girls comes to mind but there are a lot of others).
Thanks for giving us members a chance to voice an opinion! It’s one of the things that makes this a fun site!
You mean transphobes. Homophobes are gay, transphobes are those who are against trans. But your bias is showing.
Absolutely not and pornhub should not dictate what happens here.
Transgenders are not women and are all very ugly, so they do not belong on a site dedicated to discussing women’s beauty.
I think transgender people need a dedicated separate tab on the site…..I don’t think we should mingle them with the biological women. This site is dedicated exclusively to biological women, so we should have a separate section for those who wish to venture into trans folks. We shouldn’t include them in the top 100 anything, but a dedicated, separtae tab would be appropriate.
Yeah go ahead honestly as long as they extremely pass as a woman with clothes on idc really I’m not ashamed to say I’ve seen some very hot trans women in my life just as hot as naturally born women so go ahead
👍
hell nah
I think removing our male appendages and having/moulding/crafting functional female genitalias for us mtf trans girls is necessary…like removing female genitalias and having/moulding/crafting functional male appendages for ftm trans guys are or is necessary…
Pass pre-op, go post-op and pass more-r or more-so…
The fact of the matter is that are sites to go to if you specifically want to see trans models and transsexual content (shemalez.com and tranny.one), but Babepedia is really the only comprehensive database for cis women as many sites tend to contain models who are both trans and cis. Like you stated in your posts, there are ample sites that specifically contain trans porn, but as trans porn and models are becoming more popular, you can’t say the same for straight porn. Not that this is bad or anything, it is good that people are becoming more accepting, but for many people specifically seeking straight porn, their options will decrease in the future. It would be unfortunate if Babepedia saw the same fate. Instead I have an alternate solution:
I think you should make a new site dedicated to transgender models called Transbabes.com (maybe with an indicator for post-op and pre-op on each page). I feel like Babepedia should be dedicated to biological women. This way you can give trans models their own inclusive site without making it a “competition” between women. Everyone is happy 🙂
If you guys do decide to add trans models to the site instead of making a new one, another way to appease both parties is to have users go to settings and turn on a switch/button that says: “Are you interested in seeing trans models” or “Cis Only | Trans Only | Cis and Trans”
Can we all just stop bashing on transgender people. I know that there are a lot of different opinions on this, but how about if they just get treated like what they are, PEOPLE. Just like you, just like me. They are just people!!
👍
Hell no, the site is babepedia, not transpedia….
Only “XX” chromosomes, here.
Other chromosomes can have their own site.
I would love to see and hear a fully- developed and fully- integrated gruff and tough big and strong tall and thin slim and slender meaty and muscly built and buff handsome hot hairy hung hulking hunk passing post-op more-r passing ftm trans guy shooting/spraying sperm that’s his own dna into or onto a fully- developed and fully- integrated pretty petite passing post-op more-r passing mtf trans girl whose got a functioning uterus, fallopian tube, ovaries that’s her own dna…
So estrogen and testosterone blockers for pre-op mtf trans girls becomes just estrogen with/through/after current mtf trans -related/-based srs/grs/gcs…
Though, with a female -related/-based reproductive system, own dna, no need for exogenous estrogen too.
Like-wise, testosterone and estrogen blockers for pre-op ftm trans guys becomes just testosterone with/through/after current ftm trans -related/-based srs/grs/gcs.
Though, with a male -related/-based reproductive system, own dna, no need for exogenous testosterone.
Trans-genderism/trans-sexuality is developing, accordingly. I think it should remain optional, the mtf trans -related/-based reproductive system, own dna and the ftm trans -related/-based reproductive system, own dna.
Though, we should never question the mtf trans -related/-based femininities and ftm trans -related/-based masculinities.
Being born (as) a boy, living as a babe or a broad and being born (as) a girl, living as a guy…be or become normal.
There’s more-r or more-so mtfs to ftms, 76%/81% to 24%/19%, historically/formerly/previously and into the future, only current or currently current, is there an attempt or attempts to equal-ise and harmon-ise, accordingly.
Objective facts/truths/realities.
No, and I think the comment barf by the looney troon in this thread is evident enough of why.
But sure, go ahead and allow them, then the massive silent majority here can give them all a ‘1 star’. Then the community that misuses the alphabet as a call sign can complain about how BABEpedia isn’t InclUsIvE, and wrongly use terms live ‘trAnsphObic’ (whatever the hell that is) or incorrectly calls us/you homophobes (It’s not fear, it’s disgust. No one is scared of you.)
Go create your own space. Call it ‘post-op-babepedia.com’. Stop trying to weasel into places you don’t belong under the guise of normality and acceptance. You didn’t accept yourself before surgery so why should we accept you after? You can’t claim to be a female/male by redefining a word to be a feeling. Chromosomes trump all.
That means out of 1114 votes, if I did my math right, some 781 voted No, 251 voted Yes, and 82 voted Yes, but only post-op. Those numbers do not surprise me. So, in other words, it means roughly 7 out of 10 were No voted, 2 out of 10 were Yes and 1 out of 10 was Yes, but only post-op. Where studies and research have found support for transgender people.
Wow…sad day for mtf trans girls, especially post-op mtf trans girls.
🕯️🕯️🕯️🕯️
I guess I’ll remain many men’s dirty little secret…their so-called “she-male” off-sider…so many mtf trans sisters too, in my position or predicament 🥺😭
👎
Allowing/permitting my community(ies) icons/idols…would have been…so great…such a step in the right direction 😔
God, I hate our sexually-repressed jurisdictions/national or over-all jurisdictions/society(ies)/polity(ies)/nationality(ies)…/ethnicity(ies).
I’m sure me and my mtf trans sisters/girlfriends with mtf trans pussies/cunts, in particular/specifically, aware of this poll…are or is equally disappointed.
Fyi babepedia, what the hell is with allowing/permitting objectively hateful and hate-filled trans-gender/trans-sexual -phobic comments?????? Yet removing all my great points??????
We removed most of your comments because there were just too many. Around half of the comments here were made by you, often replying to yourself and repeating yourself. Please note that we didn’t remove everything. All your points should still be visible, but only once.
Please note that we also removed dozens of hateful comments by others.
Does this mean that any trans pages will be removed from the Babepedia? Because I know at least one that exists, Ines Rau.
No icons/idols main-stream, we’ll continue to be insulted and assaulted by the main-stream.
I honestly wasn’t surprised by this poll😔
1113, cause I voted yes, being the 1114, held and hold sway…probably for the foreseeable future…like 10 years easy…
According to another commentator, who argued with me, 781…voted no.
😭😭😭😭😭😭
What a miserable time to be a mtf trans girl in her making…
Future proud sex toy/doll/robot/machine/trophy…for my man.
As the other commentator who responded to you. As Gilles said they removed many of yours along with some of my. Those I disagreed with that any of my was hateful. I tried very hard to avoid being hateful. Maybe they were just removed because they removed yours, but I am against removing any comments.
Anyway, the fact you do not seem to understand that 70% of people voted against it, which is an overwhelming majority, is mindblowing to me. That was my entire point to you from the beginning. You do not care about what anyone else thinks or their personal values. You think you are right and want to force everyone else to obey.
Again, even those I voted no and was glad that they are not changing the policy, I did say that if Babepedia did start adding trans there should be a clear way of knowing trans vs non-trans. But you seem even to be again that.
So the majority of Babepedia users voted for no trans women! I can live with that although I very much enjoy trans pictorial and video clips! I’m A big fan of the skirt lifting “SURPRISE” type trans porn! But I love Babepedia and know where to find trannies when I’m in the mood for that.
What worries me is the fact that the administrators have set a precedent of letting the majority rule! What’s next for our favorite site? I’m willing to bet the majority of the members are not fans of truly obese women, probably way more than the 70% that don’t like shemales! Or how about black women? Crazily tattooed women? Women tied to the bed? How about a poll to see if the majority of the members don’t want to see women pulling open their vaginas to show us what’s inside there? Do you see my point? We shouldn’t just let majority rule or we will have a site full of Playboy type models posing modestly around the pool…….Boring!
All in all the administrators handled the trans issue as I expected and I thank them for giving us the chance to voice our opinions. Keep up the good work guys!
The area I disagreed with you is that the administration set the rule of Babepedia and they decided to place a poll. As for the other issue, it is their rule against no cock, which FYI trans women started with cocks. Obese women, which I do not like, black women, tattooed women, etc. are still women. Whereas trans women are not, they are trans men. Shemales are the same, with cock i.e. trans women. If you so like trans women, then go to another site, and let Babepedia be for non-trans women.
You can make that argument regarding the majority or not for anything.
I have a simple solution, make a poll asking if there should be a separate list for transwomen that can be toggled in options or what have you. Then have it off by default and those who want it toggled on can switch it on. Hell add other toggles too so that each person can have a custom experience.