In February of last year, we published a poll to ask our users about their opinions about transgender people. In retrospect, we made a couple of mistakes here. First, some argued that it should’ve been a simple yes/no question instead of having two yes options. Second, the poll software allowed tech-savvy users to vote multiple times, which we believe happened many times. Third, we didn’t change our policy or communicate properly after the poll concluded. This is causing some frustration among users.
Some examples
One user who is for the inclusion of post-op transgenders suggested the creation of a profile page for the following transgenders. We’re showing this list here to give those unfamiliar with TS/TG models a glimpse of what the poll is about.
Natassia Dreams
https://instagram.com/natassiadreamsgirl
Sarah N Tuned
https://www.instagram.com/sarahntuned/
Adea Danielle
https://www.instagram.com/
Mathilda Hogberg
https://www.instagram.com/
Tanya King AKA Tanya Thunderpussy
https://www.instagram.com/
It’s time for a new poll
This time, we want to do it right. So, we’ve created a form on our main site requiring you to be logged in. You can proceed to the voting page by clicking this link: https://www.babepedia.com/poll2025.
We’ll let it run for 5 days and then close it. The results will be visible here when the poll is closed.
Feel free to use the comment section to give you opinion. But please keep it civilized and respectful.
Yeah, even if you allow trans models on Babepedia, which I am fully against, I feel like it is going to happen, regardless since some continue to push for it, but having a clear maker for trans is similar to fake models. You could even do a clear maker for cisgender women, that way everyone is treated the same. White for fake models, pink for trans, and blue for cisgender women for example.
My issue with this is that it violates the “no cock” policies, a trans woman still at one point had a cock, even if they are post-op, the individual is still a biological male, hint they had a cock at one time.
nothing wrong with TG content. don’t let these fragile pissbabies & incels on this site get too angry. if they don’t like it, they can just avoid it. lots of these tiny, masculine boys are petrified of such things & we need not reward their terrible behavior
I agree and for me , just not my kink
you sound absolutely terrified
I would be confused if you add shemales without clear sign ☢️! The next step will be to give AI girls a place in babepedia 🧕. And what about animals for zoophiles🎼?
You claim “this time we want to do it right”….well that means no mentally ill homosexuals on a website of beautiful females.
Add a question to the poll “will you stop using the site if we add transgender people”.
No. Create or add a category for trans on the site. Let those into that choose that option. Don’t mix them with biological females. Doesn’t matter about “post-op” or not. They’re still males.
If there is some mechanism by which users completely opposed to seeing pre- and/or post-op transgenders could toggle a switch and completely hide them from search results, galleries, lists etc., then I think everybody would be on board, or at least, there would be very little for anyone to complain about. However, even the most moderate of the proposed plans (with the warning on the page) would still have such “babes” appearing in all sorts of ways on the site without a simple way of avoiding them completely, and for that reason I think it will do more harm than good.