In February of last year, we published a poll to ask our users about their opinions about transgender people. In retrospect, we made a couple of mistakes here. First, some argued that it should’ve been a simple yes/no question instead of having two yes options. Second, the poll software allowed tech-savvy users to vote multiple times, which we believe happened many times. Third, we didn’t change our policy or communicate properly after the poll concluded. This is causing some frustration among users.
Some examples
One user who is for the inclusion of post-op transgenders suggested the creation of a profile page for the following transgenders. We’re showing this list here to give those unfamiliar with TS/TG models a glimpse of what the poll is about.
Natassia Dreams
https://instagram.com/natassiadreamsgirl
Sarah N Tuned
https://www.instagram.com/sarahntuned/
Adea Danielle
https://www.instagram.com/
Mathilda Hogberg
https://www.instagram.com/
Tanya King AKA Tanya Thunderpussy
https://www.instagram.com/
It’s time for a new poll
This time, we want to do it right. So, we’ve created a form on our main site requiring you to be logged in. You can proceed to the voting page by clicking this link: https://www.babepedia.com/poll2025.
We’ll let it run for 5 days and then close it. The results will be visible here when the poll is closed.
Feel free to use the comment section to give you opinion. But please keep it civilized and respectful.
Update
We posted the results in this new blog post.
Yeah, even if you allow trans models on Babepedia, which I am fully against, I feel like it is going to happen, regardless since some continue to push for it, but having a clear maker for trans is similar to fake models. You could even do a clear maker for cisgender women, that way everyone is treated the same. White for fake models, pink for trans, and blue for cisgender women for example.
My issue with this is that it violates the “no cock” policies, a trans woman still at one point had a cock, even if they are post-op, the individual is still a biological male, hint they had a cock at one time.
nothing wrong with TG content. don’t let these fragile pissbabies & incels on this site get too angry. if they don’t like it, they can just avoid it. lots of these tiny, masculine boys are petrified of such things & we need not reward their terrible behavior
I agree and for me , just not my kink
you sound absolutely terrified
I would be confused if you add shemales without clear sign ☢️! The next step will be to give AI girls a place in babepedia 🧕. And what about animals for zoophiles🎼?
You claim “this time we want to do it right”….well that means no mentally ill homosexuals on a website of beautiful females.
Add a question to the poll “will you stop using the site if we add transgender people”.
No. Create or add a category for trans on the site. Let those into that choose that option. Don’t mix them with biological females. Doesn’t matter about “post-op” or not. They’re still males.
If there is some mechanism by which users completely opposed to seeing pre- and/or post-op transgenders could toggle a switch and completely hide them from search results, galleries, lists etc., then I think everybody would be on board, or at least, there would be very little for anyone to complain about. However, even the most moderate of the proposed plans (with the warning on the page) would still have such “babes” appearing in all sorts of ways on the site without a simple way of avoiding them completely, and for that reason I think it will do more harm than good.
No XY. Ever.
Never
The way I see it, putting a disclaimer on top and/or having an option to hide all transgender babes for those who want would make everyone happy, both pro and against the inclusion. I think they should be included for completion’s sake.
No chicks with dicks. I dont like the idea and i feel like most users think the same. I fucking hate when this type of content pops into my FoV. Like when im looking through nsfw gifs and out of nowhere BAM! In your face. So annoying.
The people in charge probably think this will help increase the number of visitors and thats fair, but it could also make the average user less likely to visit. Just my opinion.
@mikeroyne Heterosexual men are “petrified incels”. We just think that males into other males shouldn’t be mixed with content intended for males into females. I’m for the site letting you chose a trans category & keeping it there. As a male into females I don’t want a bunch of men into feminine men flooding the site with males. Sorry not sorry
No, please put all trans people into a separate category that can be selected or de-selected.
As expected, this will bring out the most bigoted and transphobic trolls on the site.
Transgender content gets a no from me. I enjoy the natural look and shape of a female. My voting history on this site shows that females with fake body parts are always rated lower than the natural ones, mostly because I believe you were born in the body you were meant to have.
Going WOKE is now becoming a thing of the past and has destroyed many companies. I’ll use Playboy as an example. They were once the best at what they did and then changed CEO’s and started a WOKE culture. They moved away from what people had enjoyed about their product and tried to appease to a wider fan base. This drove their loyal customers away and the new base they were hoping to attract didn’t make of for the losses.
The internet offers many choices for the type of content that Babepedia offers and, I feel, you will go the way of Playboy Magazine if you stray away from your core product.
No. Next question?
I cannot see who wrote the comment, but someone wrote, “Nothing wrong with TG content. don’t let these fragile pissbabies & incels on this site get too angry. if they don’t like it, they can just avoid it. lots of these tiny, masculine boys are petrified of such things & we need not reward their terrible behavior.”
You are exactly the problem. Judging anyone who disagrees with you as wrong and then starts name-calling. Name-calling is a result of not having a valid argument. Now, let’s flip the script, if someone called you all types of terms, you would be complaining about the treatment. So, I hope the site banned you.
Everyone that has an account on this site also has an account page. On that page there are some options that the user can turn on or off. A new addition to that list is the option to turn off comments from users that tend to talk about their self-indulgence sessions.
If you want to post Trans content please give us a similar option to turn on a blocker to keep the content from showing on our screens. Or, included the Trans photos under the same on/off option that blocks the other colorful comments.
I like the site as it is, if I want to see Trans content I can find it elsewhere. Transgender content gets a NO from me.
We considered the trans content blocking option, but it has far-reaching implications for the site. It would break many features and make the site slower. All things can be fixed, but it would require tremendous effort, and it would complicate future development. It wouldn’t be worth it, so we no longer consider that option.
I was called transphobic once because I didn’t find this horror/comedy movie starring YouTube drag queens screaming like cartoons for 90 minutes entertaining. Men in costumes… somehow became a critique about trans people. Yeah. And even though I countered that I enjoyed movies like MRS. DOUBTFIRE, WHITE CHICKS, SHE’S THE MAN, and JUST ONE OF THE GUYS didn’t count because they were actors playing roles and not drag queens (which are NON-trans men living a role).
Whatever. Sorry, that one comment berating straight men who don’t enjoy browsing chicks with dicks just triggered that dumb memory.
But like I said to that girl who called me transphobic over not finding frightened drag queens screaming at everything funny: just because I don’t/can’t beat off to man-on-man porn doesn’t make me homophobic and although I enjoy watching girl-on-girl porn doesn’t make me a hypocrite or gay.
Just answered the poll. My only “no” went to the top question; I figure to each their own, just as long as I don’t have to browse chicks with massive erections. Though given that this poll appears to be an annual thing, it suggests that its a direction this site intends on going eventually.
Just to illustrate what that future site will look like:
— The “RANDOM BABE” corner that usually cycles unflattering thumbnails of BBWs and bodybuilders will also include “traps” leading many to distrust clicking it because that rare thumbnail of a cute babe in-fact has a user-uploaded gallery filled with her heaving erection.
— UPLOAD PICS GUIDELINES: No dicks or semen. Okay… but given how straight men tend to only show off pics of their self-impressed erections, I would presume that chicks with dicks aren’t OnlyFanning their placid flaccids. That will be A LOT of throbbing dick pics on chicks to sift through… Opening emails of new uploaded pics will become even more of a crapshoot.
— The SIMILAR BABES section already tends to be proliferated with girls in no way related or similar to the profile. In addition to Cristy Ren and Sydney Sweeney being on every babe’s list along with random classic playmates, muscular bodybuilders, somebody’s mom, and blank profile thumbnails there will be “is she or is she not” unknowns.
Granted, the nature of ratings will place things where ever they go, but for a site like this (that includes a “no dicks” guideline) to aim to amend that rule just as long as those veiny erect dicks are attached to chicks with tits will be a deathnail for this site.
That’s like running a popular nekkid ladies strip club and then deciding to have some of the strippers be pre-op trans, which the customer won’t know until her thong drops (unless he happened to notice the ‘pink marker’ behind her ear).
This site is about women/babes. No matter whether they can “pass” or not transgenders are not women/babes.
Well if blocking it is not an option i think they shouldn’t be here. I don’t uderstand why some are pushing for it. If you want you can find a site that is full on trans or mixed in seconds. Why try to claw your way into site that is for people to watch/learn about/find hot girls/women? But if the majority doesn’t veiew the site this way, I will admit defeat and delete my profile because thats not the site that i want to be on.
Are there actually people who are into trans models? Or is this just about being “woke” or more PC? 🤷🏼♂️
As I use this site to look up profiles of individual women, I supposee this planned Transgender list won’t really affect me. On saying that though, I don’t see any reason to object to the list. They might not be my cup of tea, but they are still people who are entitled to express themselves any which way they like. It’s not like we pay a subscription fee. Bottom line is….. if you don’t like the list, don’t look it up.
I still cannot see who replying, but someone said, “As expected, this will bring out the most bigoted and transphobic trolls on the site.” Classic left-wing insulting attack. If you do not fully agree with them 100% on 100% of the issues, then you are a bigot, transphobic, etc.
Honestly, just create an entire new different, separate site for those individuals & the men into that. I read the comment about not being able to make a toggle on/off for the site, without slowing it down or creating problems. If that’s the case, just create a new site for those guys into those “guys”. This site demo is heterosexual males into females. The men into “other things” need their own version of “Babepedia”.
A big “NO” to include transgender women in this site, Babepedia is for biological women, if you really want to be inclusive, create a separate website for them, I think there are already websites like that.
No. This WOKE ideology is destroying anything it touches, be it movies, games. Do not go this path. Leave this site as it is: real women for men. If trans lovers want, they can create their own “better” version, with blackjack and dicks.
This is a website for cataloguing and displaying pictures of beautiful women. It’s not a website for cataloguing and displaying mentally ill men. Simple as that. If you wanna display men playing pretend, then there should be a different site for it.
I discovered that the reason the names of people who reply can’t be seen is because you probably have the site’s ‘night mode’ switched on. Turn it off and suddenly everyone’s names appear. I dunno why this is, but hope that helps.
Chuck1 you think Hillary Clinton is a 10/10, so it is no surprise that you think men should be on this site.
@MIlt. Thanks. You were right. The reason is that the text for usernames does not color from day to night. In the day mood, it is black and in the night mood it is black, but since night is dark, It appears but cannot be seen. I think you can also highlight it to see it.
Yeah, if you cannot see the username, in night mode, if you highlight the text it still appears. Again, it appeared to be an issue with the text coloring, which still seemed to be set to day mode
I think this issue can mostly be solved by some strong UX/UI work on the site. If trans profiles are going to be allowed on the site, then I ask that you please give me setting options to avoid it as much as possible. And then I won’t care. 🙂
Let’s all be real for a minute, post-ops will be the only transwomen allowed as It makes the most sense. So worries about seeing a man are honestly, moot. Especially considering a lot of famous transwomen go the distance to blend in and look feminine as possible. This isn’t about being woke either, because if it was there would be no poll.