Most popular pages: Top 100 - Best OnlyFans - Birthdays
Laurine (Model) image 1 of 4
Instagram accountOnlyFans accountTikTok account
Laurine (Model) image 2 of 4
Laurine (Model) image 3 of 4
Laurine (Model) image 4 of 4

Laurine (Model)

aka Laurine / Laurine Nickel / photography.of.memories More info on her aliases

Laurine (Model) alias list:
Laurine
Laurine Nickel
photography.of.memories - Instagram
User Rating: 9.04/10 (345 votes)
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
Your Rating: X/10
You need to be registered
and email-confirmed if you want to vote.
Rollover to rate this babe
Current rank: #165 Ranking Graph
662 have favorited her
  • Age: 25 years young
  • Born: Sunday 9th of January 2000
  • Birthplace: Germany
  • Nationality: German
  • Ethnicity: Caucasian
  • Sexuality: Straight
  • Profession: Adult Model, Glamour Model
  • Hair color: Black
  • Eye color: Brown
  • Height: 5'5" (or 165 cm)
  • Body type: Slim
  • Measurements: 36-24-35
  • Bra/cup size: 28H show conversions
  • Boobs: Real/Natural
  • Pubic hair: Trimmed/Triangle/Landing Strip
  • Years active: 2020 - present (started around 20 years old; 5 years in the business)
  • Instagram follower count: 48k (as of January 2017)

About Laurine (Model)

Nurse and part-time model. Winner of Miss Boobsrealm 2023 and 2024.

Laurine (Model) Performances

Solo: Nudity (Full)

Girl/girl: Boob Touching

Laurine (Model) Photos (Uploaded By Our Users)

Leave a comment

Commenting is disabled for non-registered users. Please register and login if you want to leave comments.

User comments

gonzagas

Posted by Mammuna 2025-01-27 10:41  🛈  

Reply to

What does a university in Spokane, Washington have to do with Laurine?

Posted by heisenberg 2025-01-27 11:28  🛈  

Reply to

Yes, that is actually quite funny...

Posted by harrie 2025-01-27 20:16 (edited 2025-02-05 22:49)  🛈  

Reply to

LMAO 😂 I think he meant gazongas & just didn't know how to spell it

Posted by HansSolo69Er 2025-02-05 04:29  🛈  

Reply to

hahaha brilliant 🤣

Posted by softnsquishy 2025-02-21 21:18  🛈  

Shouldnt we use lower numbers for the underbust/band measurement? Band size of 36 means 36 inches for the underbust/ribcage measurement. It is what you normaly get on bigger girls. She is a pretty slim babe so i think its more reasonable to assume 30/32 inches underbust and from there you estimate the overall bust size.

Posted by NxLevel 2025-01-24 16:19  🛈  

Reply to

Assumption upon assumptiom; and your point is...?

Posted by harrie 2025-01-25 20:38  🛈  

Reply to

And what do you think the values used for her stats are? You do understand that the numbers and letters used for her measurements and bra size are not her actual measurements right? They are just guesses/assumptions. Just as the stats of 90 % of the models of this website. So my point is if we are going that way we should at least understand how these things work so we can get the stats as close as possible to the real thing. Simple as that.

Posted by NxLevel 2025-01-26 01:53 (edited 2025-01-26 08:15)  🛈  

Reply to

Well I'd be willing to use my hands to measure them in order to settle this matter 😜

Posted by K-Rob1989 2025-01-26 15:03  🛈  

Reply to

Hands are outdated. If you want to measure them corretly you have to taste them. Thats how they are doing it these days i think.😈

Posted by NxLevel 2025-01-26 16:10  🛈  

Reply to

Her measurements are not estimates, she gave those in a video a while ago and they were correct on this page last time I checked, but someone must have changed them. The correct measurements are 90-61-89.

Posted by pempas 2025-02-04 02:26  🛈  

Reply to

If you click IMPROVE PROFILE > REVISION HISTORY can see all the edits in the biography but i think you already know that. I made some of those because they didnt seem right. The waist and hips measuremnt are still the same but have been converted to inches but the bust part seemed bogus. Doesnt make sense for her an overall bust of 90/35 inches when they are clearly way bigger than that. Just as it doesnt make sense an underbust of 35 given her body type. I replaced that to a 34H bra size and later on a 32I because for me it seemed like a better choice.

Posted by NxLevel 2025-02-04 21:15  🛈  

Reply to

@NxLevel Where is the "Revision History" prompt? It's not one of the 4 options under "Improve Profile".

Posted by thecrisis 2025-02-05 00:09  🛈  

Reply to

Really? Thats weird. Should be the last one after FLAG PROFILE. Freaky. Pryda might have something to say about that.

Posted by NxLevel 2025-02-05 03:35 (edited 2025-02-06 05:44)  🛈  

Reply to

OR maybe this is like a reward for The well behaved kids. The ones that follow the rules and stay out of trouble. You never know.

Posted by NxLevel 2025-02-05 06:58  🛈  

Reply to

Look up her video, she performs the measuring in front of the camera, so there is no doubt about it.

Posted by pempas 2025-02-08 03:20  🛈  

Reply to

So she did the measurement with a bra on. Some argue that this isnt how you do it.https://www.reddit.com/r/ABraThatFits/wiki/beginners_guide#wiki_measure_yourself/
I think without the bra the results would have been different. But by how much who tf knows. Im not the bra expert.
They also did not seem to be at the biggest size. I think the chair video is arguably the one where she is at her fullest. www.reddit.com/r/Laurine_busty_model/comments/1i7b8h6/wouaaaaa_gorgeous_naked_body
Im going with a 28G based on the measuring video and a 28H for her peak size but it still feels a bit off.


Posted by NxLevel 2025-02-09 17:32  🛈  

Reply to

I think she know how to measure, considering she needs a good fit for her big breasts. The way her breats look, I doubt there is much difference in circumference between having the bra on or off.
How many other pages here have measurement info from the woman in question? There are a lot of pages in the top 100 who have much less reliable data and nobody cares either way. The most reliable info is from actual famous models and if you compare them with some random instagram "models", it is easy to see that there is significant discrepancy.


Posted by pempas 2025-02-10 23:20  🛈