thecrisis's Page

Comments by thecrisis

Comments on profile pages (73)

You're absolutely right, someone linked the wrong person's accounts to this page. The one in the links is also Greek (whereas this Lera isn't).

Posted by thecrisis on Lera Kovalenko2025-06-22 14:07

Babepedia taking a bold and investigative stance is commendable. Some further proof I discovered from Emily's very own TikTok channel: she posted a video on November 25th, 2022 with the hashtag #schoolies2022 of her and her friends modeling outfits for the event.

https://www.tiktok.com/@emily.feld17/video/7169848838528797953

In Australia school years run from Jan-Dec and "Schoolies" is the tradition where graduating seniors celebrate the end of their 12 years of school. So for her to be celebrating "schoolies" in 2022 means that she was graduating HS that December.

Posted by thecrisis on Emily Feld2025-06-20 15:45

She's an adult now, she hasn't been 4'11 since she was a kid. Have you not seen her in Deadpool & Wolverine?

For comparison her co-stars Hugh Jackman & Ryan Reynolds are both 6'2 and Jennifer Garner is 5'8...
whereas people like Danny Devito (4'10), Hayden Panettiere (5'0), and Sabrina Carpenter (5'0) are unmistakably within that sub-5 foot range.


Posted by thecrisis on Dafne Keen2025-06-18 15:58

Question: Where/when were the alias names "Shemix" or "Shemao" used? Are those real? They don't exactly sound like names a girl would ever call herself on purpose (but rather like someone name-calling her a "She-Mix").

Posted by thecrisis on Seltin2025-06-18 14:48

ALL successful actor/producers are rich. She doesn't need a sugar daddy and has been acting professionally since she was 12; more than enough time to accumulate wealth from fame and endorsements.

Posted by thecrisis on Sydney Sweeney2025-06-18 04:54

You know if you web search her name (with yandex or bing) without the "allow explicit 18+ material" turned on, there are plenty of clothed pics of her that pop up.

Posted by thecrisis on Sheela A2025-06-18 04:45

Seriously? Who the hell keeps changing it to "chubby"?! Have y'all not seen the trailer for her new movie coming out this summer? Whatever "chub" weight whomever thinks she had has been long dropped for present day 2025.

Posted by thecrisis on Jennifer Love Hewitt2025-06-16 06:36

Those photos are faked. For proof, the 3rd pic from the gallery (outside front door, red shirt) is a screen grab from the very same scene of the TV movie those fake "topless" pics are from.

Posted by thecrisis on Brigid Brannagh2025-06-07 06:04

Even though you may be correct, I think the fact that almost every UNofficial source states its 2003 means that anyone with an account could've/would've changed it (in an effort to "correct" it to match). Unfortunately, even though there is SOME evidence that prove her birth year to be 2005, it isn't "ample" and seems to have been largely suppressed.

I've stumbled upon a years old, archived forum discussion that happens to include realtime picture evidence with timestamps that support your statement. But how long till that vanishes as well (like most blogs, forums, and imagehost sites seem to do after so many years).

[ Here's a link to the page (showing that SHE INDEED TURNED 18 in 2023) for anyone curious ]:
https://www.celebritystorylibrary.com/viewtopic.php?p=137280#p137280

I suspect this whole 2 year age discrepancy was probably the classic "lying about their age to land a job" (ala Tracy Lords, MC Hammer) or maybe just to skirt whatever ethical or age restrictions. In any case, the false info has been shared and permeated so much by now that unless she made some kind of clarification herself, this birthdate thing will probably keep getting edited back and forth maybe forever.

Posted by thecrisis on Emily Feld2025-06-03 01:22 (edited 2025-06-05 00:47)

I'll back you on this.

I added Annabella Sciorra, Winona Ryder, and Jennifer Connelly as well.
I tend to base my "Similar Babes" votes criteria on either 'look-a-like', 'famous association' or 'from the same era'.

Posted by thecrisis on Marisa Tomei2025-05-19 01:49

It's not either of them. It's of a model named Autumn Smith photographed by Jordan Voth. I've been intending to flag the pic but since this image has been mistaken for Milana Vayntrub for so long I want to sort out the proof to include when flagging it.

Posted by thecrisis on Milana Vayntrub2025-05-19 01:31 (edited 2025-06-11 14:18)

No whoever made that change on here did it after news broke of her disappearance. I updated her written bio last week to include this situation just in case there is any validity. There's even deeper discussions about this on Reddit which included things like an unverified screenshot of Faye's sister announcing that her sister had passed, that Las Vegas Police had declared her missing since May 7th, comments from an AMA with her ex-BF Dane something, and a tweet post by some rando druggie who said that he had seen her the other day.

Posted by thecrisis on Faye Reagan2025-05-16 03:40 (edited 2025-05-16 09:37)

🧐?! What the wha--?

This is one of those women where there is NO argument as to whether or not her breasts are real.

Can you not recognize what real breasts look like? How they move or their fluidity? How they pancake when she lies down with her arms up? Or how malleable they are when manhandled (like dough)? Or how affected they are by gravity as she flops about aimlessly?

Also, she has documented each of her multiple pregnancies on IG and OF so there is no shortage of video proof proving their authenticity.

Posted by thecrisis on Caroline Vreeland2025-05-16 03:11

You mean to say "Latin" or "Latina" with an '-a'. Latino is male, Latina is female.

Posted by thecrisis on Roberta Vasquez2025-05-14 03:52

Dude. I'd rather be "extra" than "extra special" like you're being. At no point before YOUR comment did anyone (OP included) talk about the 'legal age of consent' (which is the ACTUAL thing you meant to say, even though you're doubling down on your grammatical misspeak of "anyone in the UK can have sex after 16" when anyone/anywhere can physically have sex how ever old they feel like it).

The OP only questioned her age while other comments gave prudence to the existence of busty chicks under 18.

NOT whether or not she could have sex, or her being busty had anything to do with whether she could or did or if it was legal.

My "extra" comment was poking at the semantics of your pearl of wisdom. Because, also factually and technically (in response to the literal wording of your comments), people CAN have sex at ANY age. Whether right or wrong, legal or not, UK or US.

Posted by thecrisis on Jacklyn Roper2025-05-14 03:37

Uh... my comment was pointing out the absurdity of the wording of your statement. That people in the UK can have sex AFTER (A-F-T-E-R) 16. As if for the rest of the world all sexual activity STOPS once anyone turns 16 (but the Brits still can AFTER 16).

Fact is, anyone/everyone CAN have sex AFTER 16, and into their 20s, their 30s, 40s, 50s and old age.

Posted by thecrisis on Jacklyn Roper2025-05-13 21:40

....I'm pretty sure anyone/everyone anywhere/everywhere "can have sex AFTER 16". They even make pills to where people can have sex well into their old age.

Posted by thecrisis on Jacklyn Roper2025-05-13 15:42

You know it might actually be easier to understand you if you were to just write in your native language and let Google Translate make it make sense.

Posted by thecrisis on Anastasiia Syniavina2025-05-08 12:18

You should also include that "artificial model/person" banner at the top of the page that you've included on some other profiles like this.

Posted by thecrisis on Lisa Bon (AI)2025-05-07 08:48

🤨?! They've been on a few dates the past week... that doesn't exactly make them engaged to be married.

Posted by thecrisis on Ana De Armas2025-05-05 00:00

Um, the comment you're replying to LITERALLY just linked another proven source that suggests her birth year was 1964. PEOPLE magazine (published September of 2024) with her boyfriend (Tim Burton) wishing her a "Happy 60th!".

And 2024 minus 60 equals... what?

What is more likely:

1) That her boyfriend Tim Burton, People Magazine, and whatever other sources are all wrong?
2) Or that maybe you misread something and are mistaken?

Posted by thecrisis on Monica Bellucci2025-04-30 08:44

No UK 65P actually translates to US 30J. The letters don't translate 1 to 1. Each cup-size letter represents an inch in the US (but not in Europe or the rest of the world that use the metric system and don't count in inches).

So if it were 'P' (with it being the 16th letter) it would equate to 16 inches added onto the circumference of her chest which she says is a 30 -- even though sounds dubious but I won't debate it -- and that just doesn't pass the eye test.

Size 'J' (the 10th letter = 10 inches) looks and sounds more applicable.

Also, having just looked up her measurements to be 42-28-41 inches, a 'J' would suggest that her band-size to be 32 (but again, I won't debate it).

Posted by thecrisis on Eliz Gry2025-04-30 08:01 (edited 2025-05-14 05:00)

Actually some enhanced breasts can and do jiggle/bounce with fluidity; it helps when the girl has some boobs to begin with and only enlarge reasonably (as in not go from an A-cup to a DDD). Just look at Jessica Nigri or Amouranth whose enhanced breasts jiggle quite naturally.

A tell-tale sign of enhancements is how much firmness they tend to maintain regardless of movement, position, age, or gravity. As far as Rose here goes, I watched the video you linked and can't honestly tell one way or another.

I feel like having girls like her listed as 'unknown' is more reasonable if there is a debate over real or fake.

Posted by thecrisis on Rose Hart2025-04-30 02:36

To be fair, if you're referring to PEOPLE Magazine, then they tend to change their mind as to who the "World's Most Beautiful Person" is every year so they can't seem to make up their minds either. 🙃

Posted by thecrisis on Keeley Hazell2025-04-26 06:25

If you're referring to the busty blue tinted one at the bottom, then that is from a more current era photoshoot she did. I submitted it from a set of like 5 other pics.

*edit: Actually here's a link to a Reddit post with the full set to see for yourself:

Photoshoot by Ben Cope for IRK Magazine November 2023
https://www.reddit.com/r/CelebPhotoshoots/comments/17ow804/hayden_panettiere_photoshoot_by_ben_cope_for_irk/

Posted by thecrisis on Hayden Panettiere2025-04-24 22:14 (edited 2025-04-30 08:59)

You really enjoy jumping around profiles and threads to leave antagonistic replies every chance you get, huh?

I'm sorry I wasn't raised and taught in a country that meets your approval, but I had no choice in that matter given that I was a toddler then child, then a teen with no job, so I had to do what most people on this planet had to as a kid and that is live in the country my parents were in. I don't run the place.

Posted by thecrisis on Millie Tanaman2025-04-24 22:05

OHOHOHOhohoho okay 😂😅 That makes sense.

Yeah I am American and always get confused whenever dates are written in different orders. Sorry about that, but I guess whoever inputted it originally at Babepedia also read it the way I did and made that same mistake. Good that its all cleared up.

Posted by thecrisis on Millie Tanaman2025-04-24 17:32

Are you certain about that Pryda? I mean her own modeling reps have her birthdate as 10/5/2007. What are the chances that they are wrong, but 'guesstamation Instagram post math' is right?

Posted by thecrisis on Millie Tanaman2025-04-24 14:02 (edited 2025-04-24 14:04)

Funnily enough, according to a BABEPEDIA result (via a Google search for "Millie Tanaman birthday") it says quote:

"...Millie Tanaman Celebrating her 18th birthday on October 5 of this year."

*** edit: Yep according to her modeling representative's info (Roberto Models Agency) it lists her birthday as 10/05/2007 (appears within the text of the 2nd top result from Google searching "Millie Tanaman age") but hidden on her site profile (I presume for job booking purposes).

So looks like Babepedia had it correct (per it's Google search results).

Posted by thecrisis on Millie Tanaman2025-04-24 08:27 (edited 2025-04-24 19:13)

Maybe not during her Playboy pictorials, but they definitely are enhanced as of now.

You can actually see the difference in the pics above. Just compare how they compress/expand with her shifting positions in the old Playboy pics to the Only/Insta pics where they have doubled in size and are now rounded mounds locked onto her chest.

Posted by thecrisis on Elizabeth Ostrander2025-04-20 15:57

But this girl has shown nudity in some photosets. I'll submit a few right now for the gallery.

*edit: So I submitted 3 HQ pics showing nudity.

Posted by thecrisis on Olya Derkach2025-04-18 05:19 (edited 2025-04-22 20:16)

Not only does that not make any sense (and every short person that has ever shopped for clothes would disagree with), but the literal definition is "attractively small and dainty (used of a woman)".

But so by your own personally defined metric, 5'0" and skinny Hayden Panettiere was only petite when her natural boobs were small Bs, but the second she bought implants and became a D-cup (the still 5'0" and skinny) Hayden was no longer "petite"?! Same thing with 5'0" Dolly Parton who's oversized boobs are also store bought.

Are they only petite just as long as you only see them from behind? You couldn't determine if a 4'11 skinny chick was petite until she turned around? Seriously?!

What if those women were just stuffing their padded push-up bras to appear bustier? So then would they only be petite when they are naked, but as soon as they strap on a padded up bra filled with tissue paper they're suddenly NOT little anymore?

All of that... is fundamentally... ludicrous.

Posted by thecrisis on Lera Kovalenko2025-04-18 02:16 (edited 2025-06-22 13:53)

She's also roughly 5'2 ft tall. Which means she is tiny and shops in the petite section (but gets her bras in a different one). Just like the 5'0" ft tall (slim & busty) Dolly Parton, same with the 5'2" (curvy) Salma Hayek, the 4'11 (slim & busty) Kristin Chenoweth, the 5'0" (slim & busty) Hayden Panetitere, and any other girl hovering around 5' foot.

Despite what they might look like in film and photos, in real life these women are practically pocket-size.

Posted by thecrisis on Lera Kovalenko2025-04-17 01:36 (edited 2025-06-22 13:55)

Just FYI, this chic (internet personality/model) and Anna363636 (camgirl/Onlyfans) are two entirely different people. For one, this girl is a hispanic brunette with brown eyes and Anna363636 is a strawberry blonde white girl with blue eyes.

Posted by thecrisis on Anna Fuertes Guerra2025-04-14 07:10

She's actually mixed between Polish and Italian.

Posted by thecrisis on Wendy42025-04-09 09:17

If you'd seen her TikTok videos and her workout/fitness stuff, you would NOT be labeling her "chubby". Ignore the low camera angle girls use to make their boobs and butt look bigger, see her in motion. Her legs are muscled like a runners, with abs to boot.

Posted by thecrisis on Bella Ramos2025-03-30 11:48

That wasn't the only thing wrong with the bio, it said she was 34 years old as well.
I fixed things in accordance to what info I could find.

Posted by thecrisis on Bella Ramos2025-03-29 15:33

That guy is 100% correct, that pic in the blue spandex is a photoshop of her head on the body of a model named Natasha Marley for Latexotica. Found via Yandex reverse image search. I'll try and get the site to correct that (flagging it is not an option for some reason) as well as get some pics up showcasing Ms. Robb's asset as well.

Posted by thecrisis on AnnaSophia Robb2025-03-10 19:18

Presto. Wish, granted.

Posted by thecrisis on Olga Boyko2025-03-04 12:11

I've observed from my experience over past 3 months (of flagging, uploading, cleaning up pages) that those profiles with an excess number of pics are created when there are long standing duplicate profiles and the site finally gets around to merging them into one.

Posted by thecrisis on Janet Mason2025-03-04 04:32

Whatever it is she looks like that one "Momo face/challenge" meme from forever ago.

Posted by thecrisis on Haru Minato2025-02-26 11:39

@NxLevel Where is the "Revision History" prompt? It's not one of the 4 options under "Improve Profile".

Posted by thecrisis on Laurine (Model)2025-02-05 00:09

Of course, and as always I had abided by them to the letter (although I only discovered last week that they are more like
suggestions). Nowhere anywhere did/does it say anything against nudity.

Are you trying to tell me that you're the one who got them removed?

Curiously I noticed that someone has done their best to nuke her naked pics from the internet as a Google search for her
produces roughly 800+ DCMA content removal tags in place of results.

Posted by thecrisis on WettMelons2025-02-02 06:25 (edited 2025-02-02 06:28)

Wha-?! Every single pic I posted that showed any nudity got removed. :(

Posted by thecrisis on WettMelons2025-01-31 08:55

I had just watched this crime movie the other day on TUBI in which I didn't realize that she was one of the co-stars until I saw her name in the end credits. I racked my brain thinking "How did I miss her?" as I went back and sped through it all over again trying to pinpoint what must've been a small role, but still couldn't find her.

So I decided to just let the movie play again as I paid closer attention this time to listen for someone to say her character's name...

Turned out it wasn't a bit part at all and she acted with the main leads in many scenes. I just didn't recognize her and had never heard her speak before then. She did fine, but it was a bit like seeing your school teachers outside of school when you were a kid.

Or like seeing Emily Bloom randomly acting in an episode of "Its Always Sunny...".

The flick was called DEADLY MATRIMONY (2018), by the way, for anyone curious.

Posted by thecrisis on Keeley Hazell2025-01-25 16:52

I'm a 25 years in professional artist (and photography hobbyist). I honestly don't care to converse with you either over such a ridiculous topic (when her makeover can be reasonably credited to both her weight loss AND professional photography). Shocker, both can be correct without you dismissing one and exclaiming the other.

Also, Playboy photoshoots have always been TERRIBLE and overly hazed to excessively airbrushed with uncreative posing and unimaginative camera angles (as well as practically no utilization of a depth of field).

But yeah, Mark Twain Tom Sawyer.

Posted by thecrisis on Chloe Surreal2025-01-25 15:48

@ Pryda
I honestly don't understand the fear that people would arbitrarily distort a pic or even enlarge one to meet a minimum 1024 pixel height. That is not an unreasonable low bar to meet as even the most general pics available from social media are 1080 pixels, but a lot of these sub-1000 pics seem to be the first preview image grabbed from galleries when all it'd take was a second click to grab the larger pic.

Hell MANY of the hi-res pics I've been submitting to replace the deluge of lo-res images is simply by 'Yandex reverse image search' or typing info about the pic into 'Google image advance search set to 2mb - 6mb'.

Enforcing a minimum standard would encourage people to grab better copies of images rather than lo-res 300x600 pics. And go a long way to ensuring a quality control.

Hell there is even a 564x564 square pic in Sydney Sweeney's gallery. That is roughly the size of the native resolution of computer app icons (which used to be 512x512).

Sigh. Sorry.... end of rant. I'll end my crusade.

Posted by thecrisis on Annett Gebhardt2025-01-24 19:06 (edited 2025-01-24 19:14)

Discounting the transformation her weight loss made on her current appearance (and insisting that older pics when she was chubby is how "she REALLY looks") is like saying the singer Adele "really looks" 50 lbs. overweight still, despite her weight loss; or Michael Jackson "really looks" like his younger pics despite the endless plastic surgery; or ANYBODY's current day pics mean nothing because its their pics from 10 years ago that "reveal how they really look".

That is preposterous.

Posted by thecrisis on Chloe Surreal2025-01-24 18:47

She has once. In a video.

Posted by thecrisis on Tessa Fowler2025-01-24 11:36

I think fans of this chick should be making requests to trash some of these pics and replace them with her current hawt thin self since she is unrecognizable now. The galleries don't match the profile pic.

Posted by thecrisis on Chloe Surreal2025-01-24 04:46

🧐 HONEST QUESTION :
How does a new profile of a non-famous babe that just LAUNCHED 2 DAYS AGO (on January 22nd) already amass 60+ votes and reach #2 on the all-time Top List?

Also, are the pics uploads guidelines only suggestions and not mandates? The rules say pics have to be "high quality" and at least 1024 pixels in length, yet SO MANY pics on this site are around 400ish to 890ish. I've only been on this site for over a month now and have been diligently trying to upgrade the TONS of lo-res pics on EVERY profile to hi-res images, but if even brand new 2025 profiles are allowing these lo-res, icon-sized pics in then the guidelines mean nothing and there's really no point in me uploading HQ images anymore.

Posted by thecrisis on Annett Gebhardt2025-01-24 04:31 (edited 2025-01-24 11:05)

No the tits are real...ish (though I can tell she is enhancing them using an enlargement morph) but it's the face that is significantly faked through a face filter app.

Posted by thecrisis on Honey Bee2025-01-23 18:46 (edited 2025-03-04 11:03)

No shade, but how is this like the top ranked Cosplayer on this site? Of all of the great costuming, artistic photos, professional photoshoots, non-face filtered, authentic IRL bodies (not poorly malformed in photoshop), prettier and sexier girls out there (with much more diverse uploaded pics galleries) -- how is this what's right at the top?

Posted by thecrisis on Kalinka Fox2025-01-21 07:06 (edited 2025-01-21 07:10)

@ Lalalamn As the uploader of the biggest sized images up there, I can confirm that her eyes are indeed 'hazel', not regs 'ol green. The images I have are usually 2xs or 3xs the dimensions and have higher fidelity than whatever I manage to upload (after resizing, and minimal compression if need-be, to get it under 1 meg).

Also just by reading the description of what hazel eyes look like it describes EXACTLY what her eyes look like.

Posted by thecrisis on Ana De Armas2025-01-17 06:42

That's why they call it the "uncanny valley". Your brain knows something is off, but its so strange that you can't pin point it. From what I can tell she is using an app face filter. That's why if you glance your eyes from any one random pic to the next it feels like the exact same face is pasted on every one. Also, notice how the face is usually in HD but the rest of the photo can have compression artifacts or digital fuzz. That is IMPOSSIBLE to have in an unaltered photo.

Posted by thecrisis on Biancadata2025-01-13 17:45

Whatever dude. I've not changed what I said. All I did was use more synonyms and word options for words you took issue with: "extend" (adds to) and "from the ribcage" (circumference around...); The measurement around the rib cage (the torso, the circumference of the upper body minus breasts and arms) IS exactly what the "band size" is.

The bust letters are then the number of inches the boobs adds to it when included in the tape measure. Yeah the bra cup extending from the chest don't have to match the actual breasts size (for example an ex-GF with "DDD"s liked to wear one size smaller to make her cleavage even bigger) so I was mainly illustrating how ludicrous it was to insist that the 10-inch J cup bra size (not braless boobs) was what this lady is housing her pups in.

So forgive my initial lack of clarification.

But this isn't worth debating. We're essentially saying the same thing. Like I said, it's simple math.

Posted by thecrisis on Veronika Fortova2025-01-13 15:41 (edited 2025-01-13 16:22)

@ yamnaya Dude. Me having an understanding of what women's bra sizes mean (in the U.S.) says the opposite of me "needing to go outside".

And regardless of what you want to stick to, "65" is not a number represented in U.S. band sizes (where the alphabet designation is used as a measurement in inches). "65" sounds like its in centimeters (which is the measurement used in the rest of the world) so "65J" may mean something different and be accurate whereever she's from, but it doesn't auto-translate to meaning "30 inch base + J (10 inch bust)".

Hell we doubled and tripled our "D"s just to keep from calling 5 and 6 inches "E"s and "F"s. Its confusing here.

Posted by thecrisis on Veronika Fortova2025-01-13 13:10 (edited 2025-01-13 13:25)

@ mrdoctor I know exactly how it works, it is simple math.

The difference between the band size and the bust size IS the number of inches extended from the band size (which is the circumference around the torso (or rib cage, or the base chest area minus the breasts)). Each letter representing a number (A = 1, J = 10) in inches, as in the number of inches the bust adds to (or extends) the circumference beyond the "band" or "torso" or "rib cage" or "chesticle" or whatever term you wanna call it.

Posted by thecrisis on Veronika Fortova2025-01-13 12:58 (edited 2025-01-13 13:30)

Yeah those are NOT 'J's. J means her bra adds TEN (10) INCHES to the circumference of her rib cage. Just 2 inches short of a foot-long Sub, or a 12-inch ruler, or the width of an iPad Pro. I had changed it to 'G' being generous, but whomever is insisting that they extend like a foot from her chest either doesn't know the alphabet very well or is assigning letters like he's grading papers.

Posted by thecrisis on Veronika Fortova2025-01-13 01:15 (edited 2025-02-07 02:58)

A bit of both. Her body is authentic, but the face is using an app filter to modify features. I discovered this when I tried to upscale an image and the face came out in pristine HD, but the body was covered in compressed jpeg artifacts and digital fuzz. As if the face, and only the face, were taken in 4K resolution, but the body was stuck with the 720p from the camera.

Posted by thecrisis on Maya Singer2025-01-11 22:51

It's the opposite. Body is authentic, but the face is using an app filter to modify features.

Posted by thecrisis on Maya Singer2025-01-11 22:47

Just occurred to me that out of all of these pics not a single one of them have her nude.... well that's about to change once the next upload is approved.

Posted by thecrisis on Solomiya Maievska2025-01-10 06:18

Because it matches closely with her initials; so she HAS to have that expression resting on her face at all times. ;p

Posted by thecrisis on Rebecca Bagnol2024-12-30 13:25

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Doubtful.

Posted by thecrisis on Annabella Doe2024-12-24 04:17

Her 2 and only sets are from the years 2008 and 2017. Presumably both sets were shot around the same time so 2008 was before today's AI takeover.

Posted by thecrisis on Karla S2024-12-23 09:50

Have you never seen what Ariel Winter, Abigail Breslin, Christina Ricci, Punky Brewster, Rebecca Black, or Leni Klum looked like as they hit 18? They all developed back-breaking busts early.

Posted by thecrisis on Jacklyn Roper2024-12-16 05:43

That 2nd pic from the User Uploaded pics is a fake AI generated artwork. It's not even of her body as NONE of her tattoos are present. I've flagged it many times, but I've yet to ever see that do anything.

*update: Well looks like it was finally removed.

Posted by thecrisis on Alla Berger2024-12-14 02:19 (edited 2024-12-15 01:38)